Корпорацияда аксиядорларнинг ҳуқуқий мақоми тушунчаси тўғрисида

Mualliflar

  • Саид Гулямов Тошкент давлат юридик университети

Ulashish

Kalit so‘zlar:

акционерлик жамияти акция ҳуқуқий ҳолати

Annotasiya

Корпорациянинг енг муҳим хусусиятларини белгилайдиган ҳуқуқий таъриф: бу бир ёки бир нечта шахс томонидан уларнинг мулкий бадаллари ва (ёки) саъй-ҳаракатларини (меҳнат иштирокини) бирлаштириш ва улар томонидан сотиб олиш асосида ташкил етилган юридик шахс, бунинг евазига юридик шахсни бошқаришда иштирок етиш ҳуқуқи ва унинг соф даромадини корпорациянинг ҳар бир аъзосига тегишли бўлган ушбу юридик шахснинг устав капиталидаги иштирок етиш улушига тўғри келадиган миқдорда тақсимлаш.

Muallif biografiyasi

Саид Гулямов, Тошкент давлат юридик университети

Юридик фанлари доктори, Профессор

Bibliografik manbalar

Ruben D. The Existence of Social Entities (1982),Z/Philosophicab Quarterly; P. 295.

Функ Я- И., Михальченко В. А., X в алей В. В. Акционерно общество: история и теория (Диалектика свободы). Мн.: Амалфея, 1999. С. 368.

Гражданское право: В 2 т. T. 1: Учебник/'Под ред. Е. А. Суханова. 2-е изд. М.: Изд. .«БЕК», 1998. С. 477.

McGuire, J. В., S u n d g г е п А. arid Schneeweis T. (1988). Corporate social responsi’bility and f-irm financial Performance//Academy of Management Journal. 31 (4). P. 354—372.

Berie A. A.. Means G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. The MacMillan Company . New York.

Friedman M. (196.2). Capitalism and Freedom/’/Chicago University Press, Chicago; Friedman M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits//New York Tinies Magazine. September 13. P. 32—33, 122, 124, 126.

Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations 699—700 (Modern Library ed.. 1937).

Berle A. A., Means G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. The MacMillan Company, New York.

Ronald Coase. The Nature of the Firm//Economica. 1937. № 4. P. 3864-405.

Jensen М. С., Meck lin g W. H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure/’/Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3. P. 305—360.

Fama E., J e n s e it M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and ResidualCIaims//Journal of Law and Economies. Vol. 26. P. 327-352.

Eisen ha rdt К. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review/'/Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 58.

Manne H. G. (1965). Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control/'/Jour, of Political Economy. Vol. 75. P. 110—126.

Keynes J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. Macmillan, London; Shi lier R. J. (1989). Do Stock Prices Move too much to be Justified by Subséquent Changes in Dividends/’/R. J. Shiiler (ed.). Market' Volatility, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Campbell A. (1997). Stakeholders, the Case i!n Favour. Long Rangé Planning. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 446—449; P lender J.(1997). A Stakeholder, in the’Futuie: the Stakeholding Solution. Nicholas Brearley. London; Centre for Tomorrow’s Company (CTC) (1998). The Inclusive Approach and Business Success: the Research Evidence. CTC, London.

Swanson, Diane L. (1999). Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance//'Academy of Management Review. 24(3) (July). P. 506—521.

Kay J„ Silberston A. (1995). Corporate Governance//National Institute Economic Review’. August. Vol. 84. P. 84—97.

Deakin S., Slinger G. (1997). Hostile Takeovers, Corporate Law, and the Theory of the Firm/'/Jourrial of Law and Society. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 124—151; Warren R. C. (2000). Corporate Governance and Accountability//Liverpool Academic Press. Bromborough. P. 18.

13 3

Nashr qilingan

03-02-2004

Kategoriyalar

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Гулямов, С. (2004). Корпорацияда аксиядорларнинг ҳуқуқий мақоми тушунчаси тўғрисида. G’ulomov Said Saidaxrarovich, 1(1). Retrieved from https://www.old.gulyamov.org/index.php/said/article/view/55