The legal essence of corporate relations and the "AGENCY PROBLEM"

Authors

  • Said Gulyamov Tashkent State University of Law

Share

Keywords:

corporate relations the essence of the corporation corporation

Abstract

Interpretation of the relations between shareholders and joint-stock companies in the light of well-known civil law institutions not only does not meet the classical standards of civil law, but also has negative economic consequences for the activities of corporations. At the same time, as can be seen, the role of law in the classical interpretation of these relations as binding or relative is ineffective due to the illogical definition of the subject composition of such relations as shareholders, on the one hand, and JSC, on the other, as a subject responsible for violations of shareholders' rights.

Author Biography

Said Gulyamov, Tashkent State University of Law

Doctor of Law, Professor

References

Закон Республики Узбекистан «Об акционерных обществах и защите прав акционеров» от 26.04.1996 №223-1// ИПС «Норма» от 24.04.2004.

TrickerR. I. Corporate Governance. Dartmouth Publishing Company. England: Aidershot, 2000. P.248.

Бердникова T. Б. Рынок ценных бумаг и биржевое дело: Учебное пособие. М., 2000. С.9: Michael Barclay & Clifford Holderness. Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations //J. Fin. Econ. 1989. № 25. P.371.

Гражданское право: В 2 т. T.I: Учебник /Под ред. Е.А. Суханова. 2-е изд. М., 2002. С.314.

Roberta S. Karmel. Turning Seats into Shares: Causes and Implications of Demutualization of Stock and Futures Exchanges // Hastings Law Journal. 2002. № 53. P.367-428.

Edward Rock. Securities Regulation as Lobster Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory of Mandatory Disclosure // Cardozo L. Rev. 2002. № 23. P.675, 690.

Гражданское право. Т. I. С.319-320.

Закон РФ «О защите прав и законных интересов инвесторов на рынке ценных бумаг» от 12.02.1999. http://lin.ru (на страничке "Законодательные и нормативные акты»).

ч.1 ст..З Закона РУз «О ценных бумагах и фондовой бирже» от 02.09.1993. №18-ХП // ИПС «Норма» от 24.04.2004.

: Robert Cooter&BradleyJ. Freedman. The Fiduciary Relationship: Its Economic Character and Legal Consequences // NY. U.L. Rev. 1991. № 66. P. 1045, 1054-1056.

Ronald Gilson. The Globalization of Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function // American Journal of Comparative Law. 2001. № 49. P. 329-357.

ThomasR. Hurst&Larry J. McGuinness. The Corporation, the Bondholder and Fiduciary Duties // J.L. & Com. 1991. № 10. P.187, 205.

J а у W. Lorsch&EIizabethMaciver. Pawn or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. 1989. P.17-18.

LewisA. Kornhauser. The Nexus of Contracts Approach to Corporations: A Comment on Easterbrook and Fischel II Colum. L. Rev. 1989. № 89. P.1449-1458,

J ensenMichaelC. and Meckling William H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure II Journal of Financial Economies. October, 1976. Vol. 3. № 3. P.305-360.

Hart О. and Moore J. Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation // Econometrica. 1988. №56. P.755-786.

ShleiferA. A Survey of Corporate Governance. 1989. P.10

: Grossman S., H a r t. O. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership. 1986. P.652.

Положение ЦККФРЦБ РУз «О раскрытии информации участниками рынка ценных бумаг». Утверждено приказом Генерального директора ЦККФРЦБ РУз при ГКИ от 27.03.2002 г. N2002-06, зарегистрированным МЮ РУз 18.04.2002 г. N1127 // ИПС «Норма» от 24.04.2004.

11 5

Published

2004-04-11

How to Cite

Gulyamov С. (2004). The legal essence of corporate relations and the "AGENCY PROBLEM". Gulyamov Said Saidakhrarovich, 1(1). Retrieved from https://www.old.gulyamov.org/index.php/said/article/view/56